Download PDF

ES Journal of Clinical Medicine

ISSN: 2768-010X

Combined FDG-PET/Contrast-Enhanced CT in the Diagnosis of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Monocentric Study

  • Research Article

  • Jenny Tannoury1*,5, Sebastien Mule2,3,5, Emmanuel Itti2,5, Alain Luciani2,3,5, Isabelle Baumgaertner, Hugo Rotkopf1,5, Julie Assaraf1,5, Charlotte Gagniere1, Aurelien Amiot1,5, and Iradj Sobhani1,5
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, France
  • 2Department of Nuclear medicine, Henri Mondor University Hospital, France
  • 3Department of Radiology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, France
  • 4Department of Oncology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, France
  • 5EC2M3-EA7375 Paris Est Creteil University (UPEC), Val de Marne, France
  • *Corresponding author: Jenny Tannoury, Department of Gastroenterology, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Hopital Henri Mondor, Gastroentérologie, 51 Av Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Creteil, France
  • Received: May 27, 2020; Accepted: June 25 2020; Published: June 29, 2020

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced CT scan and 18FDG-PET are used in the staging and surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC). We here evaluate the feasibility of combined FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in one diagnostic session in the diagnostic of recurrent colorectal cancer.45 patients underwent planned 159 procedures. 109 (68%) were performed as a combined modality in a single session and 50 were planned as two separate procedures at different times. Fourteen patients experienced recurrence during the study period. Sensitivity of 18FDG-PET scan and contrast-enhanced CT scan in detecting a recurrent disease was 84.4% and 86.6 % respectively with a specificity of 96% and 97% respectively. FDGPET and contrast-enhanced CT findings were concordant in 79% of cases. The overall sensitivity and specificity in detecting CRC recurrence were 80% and 99% respectively in the combined procedure and 89% and 98% respectively in the two-time procedure. The positive predictive value of the procedure (combined or two-time procedure) for detection of recurrent CRC was 100% with, however a shorter delay for decision with the combined [7.7vs 12.2 days] (p<0.05).

The combined procedure is feasible in almost 2/3 of cases. When compared to the two-time procedure, it is performant in detecting recurrent CRC with shorter delay to therapy.

Keywords

PET; CT; 18FDG; Colon; Cancer