The dynamics of any disease development is determined by the presence of biological rules and laws that exist in nature. Due to the influence of such stereotypes, the originality of clinical manifestations of a particular pathology is formed. This is an axiom of biological rhythms of living nature, which must be taken into account when conducting scientific research and searching for interpretations of the clinical picture of various diseases. As a result, a differentiated view of the uniqueness of the mechanism of development and clinical manifestations of each individual disease is formed, which is the basis of the principles of diagnosis and treatment.
The basis of the evolution of medical knowledge and concepts is well known and is unlikely to cause anyone serious objections, as are the obvious differences between pneumococcal meningitis and pneumococcal pneumonia, or between staphylococcal sinusitis and staphylococcal soft tissue abscess, is not it? However, the evidence of General principles in the study of various pathologies does not mean that these approaches are always strictly followed. Therefore, when the results are analyzed and interpreted based on common signs or similarities of complications of various diseases, the quality of such analysis, in my opinion, decreases, to the point of distortion of the results. A separate analytical approach is especially important when considering processes with impaired hemodynamics, depending on the location of the main focus within the small or large circle of blood circulation.